A lot of our lives is now spent on screens, but books have quite stubbornly resisted this trend.
So much of our lives now exists online. From our work to our entertainment and our shopping, the web now touches almost every part of our lives. Although the internet has actually definitely made a great deal of things a lot easier and much more available for a great many people, it does take away from some things. Looking for beautiful books in a charming little bookshop, for example, is definitely nicer than just striking 'order' when buying them online. People like the co-CEO of the hedge fund that owns Waterstones would probably value the joys of offline shopping in bookshops.
We are frequently informed that technology is the unavoidable development of things, an important enhancement that they would not make it through without, however is this actually correct? It is a simple myth to buy into, we have all experienced how cellular phones have made our lives simpler, offering us access to more things than we know how what to do with, but we also understand how it has actually harmed us as well. And numerous things have in fact rather stubbornly resisted digitalisation, like books. Although it may have been anticipated that online books would make their print predecessors a thing of the past, that has not occurred at all, maybe talking to the limits of digitalisation and blowing a book-shaped hole in the myth of technological development. Individuals like the CEO of the asset manager with a stake in Amazon books may know how books have withstood being technologically updated.
In this day and age we spend so much of our time taking a look at screens. Our work is very often on screens, and they are coming to be a much larger part of our working life, and the manner in which we relax tends to use screens, and, possibly unsurprisingly, they ae coming to be an even larger part of our relaxation also. For a number of us, relaxation is associated with watching films or tv, all of which is done on a screen, or maybe checking out a book, which had managed to stay clear of the monopolisation of the screen until rather recently. Books are one of the oldest technologies that we still use today, with the book as we know it today being practically the same for about 2 thousand years now. Although eBooks might have been offered as the inevitable progression of the book, possibly having at least one thing in your life that you do far from a screen is good reason enough to avoid them. Individuals like the co-founder of the impact investor with a stake in World of Books would most likely value the appeal of checking out a book without the requirement for a screen.